This site has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
http://endpoliticsasusual.com
and update your bookmarks.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Couric-Palin: Stumped on Supreme Court Cases

Here is the much anticipated Roe v. Wade question. It's not as awful as some of her other answers, but she's definitely stumped.

Update: I've uploaded the video that has Biden's answer to the question as well. His choice of Supreme Court case that he disagreed with? The one that overruled a law that he wrote. A sharp contrast to Palin's vagaries.



COURIC: What other Supreme Court decisions [than Roe v. Wade] do you disagree with?

PALIN: Well, let's see. There's --of course --in the great history of America rulings there have been rulings, that's never going to be absolute consensus by every American. And there are--those issues, again, like Roe v Wade where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So you know--going through the history of America, there would be others but--

COURIC: Can you think of any?

PALIN: Well, I could think of--of any again, that could be best dealt with on a more local level. Maybe I would take issue with. But you know, as mayor, and then as governor and even as a Vice President, if I'm so privileged to serve, wouldn't be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today.

h/t: Politico

Sphere: Related Content
blog comments powered by Disqus